Getting down in the Greek
Published on January 4, 2006 By Adventure-Dude In Religion
Many people out there have grown up with the notion that Jesus did away with the “Old Law” and implemented a new law. This is very misunderstood especially due to the English language. I want to look at the root of this misunderstanding. Matthew 5:17 is the most often quoted verse to me so let’s start there.

Matthew 517 ~ ‘Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. (KVJ)’

Taking this at face value I would say that you have a good argument but let’s take a dictionary definition of fulfill courtesy of dictionary.com

Link

ful•fill also ful•fil P Pronunciation Key (f l-f l )
tr.v. ful•filled, ful•fill•ing, ful•fills, also ful•fils
1. To bring into actuality; effect: fulfilled their promises.
2. To carry out (an order, for example).
3. To measure up to; satisfy. See Synonyms at perform. See Synonyms at satisfy.
4. To bring to an end; complete.


As you will see there are two definitions here. To measure up to and To bring to an end. Do we just roll the dice and let fate decide? I do not find it so easy. So it is off to the Greek to hopefully resolve this conflict.

Utilizing Biblebrowser.com we will use their greek Lexicon for our study.

pleroo < play-ro'-o: to make replete, i.e. (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish

Now going back to dictionary.com we will look at the word replete.

re•plete P Pronunciation Key (r -pl t )
adj.
1. Abundantly supplied; abounding: a stream replete with trout; an apartment replete with Empire furniture.
2. Filled to satiation; gorged.
3. Usage Problem. Complete: a computer system replete with color monitor, printer, and software.


So if we take the definition of fulfill and the definition of replete what definition do we find in common? I know that you see the word ‘complete’ in replete but look at the following elaboration of the use of ‘complete.’ It is probably not the same definition you had in mind is it?
Jesus didn’t come do away with the law as he states but to replete by following the Laws perfectly. He is our perfect example of how we should strive to live.

He observed all of the Laws and when we say, “What would Jesus Do?” Does that have a new meaning to you?

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 07, 2006
Is this Kabbalah? I'm thinking the first word is "you"?


Thine


Well Thine and You are basically the same......
on Jan 08, 2006
Well don't know much about Kabbalah, I have to admit. But thinking it's got to do with Jewish mystisim? And I have no idea what LBRP is? Care to share?
on Jan 09, 2006
I believe we should be teaching 90% law and 10% grace which is unlike the churches today.


I agree that there simply isn't much teaching on Law. Galatians 3:24 Says that the Law is to point us to Christ. This is pretty straight forward in my mind. Christ is holy and that is what we are called to be. As for your comment about Grace. I stated in a comment that I was going to discuss the word grace in the scriptures. I have decided that this would be best done in it's own Article. To briefly tell you what to expect is that there are two types of Grace written in the scriptures. Grace - beauty/charm and mery/unmerited favor. I think you will be surprised on my findings. But look for that more formal writing soon. I am hoping to have it here by the end of the week.

Ex 24:1-8 shows the OC ratified and sealed with blood.


Yes, throughout all of scriptures we see many covenants sealed/ratified by the shedding of blood (ie. circumcision, marriage, sacrifice, etc...). I guess I was missing your point. This doesn't do away with any of the previous covenants. Okay so you accept that the covenant with the rainbow is still in existance right? Then to you which covenants are done away with? I don't disagree that each new covenant was better and better. But I don't see them doing away with. I am thankful I don't have to sacrifice a bull each fall just for my sins. But other than the covenant of sacrifice being modified I don't see how the other ones are done away with (Kosher, Sabbath, etc).

And it does say the Old is done away with in 2 Cor 3:6-11.


I reiterate which one is 'done away' with?
We know that the wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23). Romans 3:20, tells us that through the law we gain the knowledge of sin. Seems to me if all the law was done away with then we would have NO knowledge of sin. And if I am not mistaken you said that we SHOULD teach more of the law. Maybe it's just me but you contradict yourself? If so this is my huge frustration with Christian theology (or should I call it the pick and choose theology). For I can get Jesus and a cherry pie (with icing if I am good) life too right? That's not what my bible says.

Peace and blessings,

Adventure Dude
on Jan 09, 2006
And if I am not mistaken you said that we SHOULD teach more of the law. Maybe it's just me but you contradict yourself


I'm saying we should teach the law to show how far we are from God's idea of perfection. Not that I believe we are under the law. We are under Grace.

God says he is holy and nothing unholy is going to enter into his presence. We cannot dwell with him until we deal with our sin. Well it was dealt with on the cross. But unless we realize that we are sinners (that's where the law shows us) we cannot understand fully what God's grace truly is.

So it's no contradiction. I do not believe scripture teaches we are under the OC. But I do believe we should teach the OC so we can fully understand what the NC means to us.

We cannot accept the cure until we realize how sick we are.

agree that there simply isn't much teaching on Law. Galatians 3:24 Says that the Law is to point us to Christ


Exactly. Bingo. That's the whole function of the law.
2 Pages1 2